Skip to content
0xinsider vs StructUpdated Sep 17, 2026

Struct Alternative: A Trader Product Against a Polymarket API and Its Showcase Dashboard

Struct sells Polymarket API infrastructure with a free self-serve tier and a dashboard called Struct Explorer. 0xinsider is a purpose-built sports-and-esports product with a published grade.

Quick verdict

Struct is a Polymarket data-infrastructure company: a self-serve API with a free tier, mark-to-market wallet P&L, cross-venue market matching in early access, and Struct Explorer, an open-source dashboard built to show what the API can do. Explorer's own site returned a bot-verification challenge on every fetch during this review, so its facts here come from its GitHub README rather than a live check. 0xinsider is a purpose-built sports-and-esports product: a published grade with eligibility floors, a full risk-metric set, and no self-serve API tier.

At a glance

Fast signals before you read the full breakdown.

Use the quick scan to see where each platform leads before drilling into the longer sections below.

Self-serve API access

B leads

0xinsider

Requires an active Pro subscription

Struct

Free tier (5,000 credits/mo), plus pay-per-call in USDC

Venue coverage

B leads

0xinsider

Polymarket

Struct

Polymarket live; cross-venue market matching (Kalshi, Limitless, Predict.fun, Hyperliquid) in early access

Trader grade

A leads

0xinsider

Published grade with eligibility floors

Struct

Trader DNA archetype; method not published, no composite score found

Live verification on 2026-09-17

A leads

0xinsider

Fully reachable

Struct

explorer.struct.to returned an HTTP 429 challenge to every fetch

Feature matrix

0xinsider vs Struct feature comparison

Feature
0xinsider
Struct
Type
Prediction-market analytics for sports and esports
Polymarket data-infrastructure company; Struct Explorer is its open-source showcase dashboard
Platforms and venues
Polymarket
Polymarket live; 5-venue market matching in early access (Kalshi, Limitless, Predict.fun, Hyperliquid, plus Polymarket)
Self-serve API tier
None; API access requires Pro
Free tier, 5,000 credits/month, plus x402 pay-per-call in USDC
Trader scoring
0-100 grade, F-to-S, with eligibility floors above C
Trader DNA: a seven-axis radar archetype; method not published in its README
Risk metrics per trader
Sharpe, Sortino, drawdown, expectancy, VaR, Kelly fraction
PnL, win rate, hold time, and drawdown risk via the API, per its docs
Insider / unusual-activity detection
Insider Radar: statistical flags with wallet, market, and timestamp
An 'Insider Finder' AI Chat agent that requires an API key
Alerts
Email on named wallets and markets
30+ in-app alert types and 30+ webhook event types, plus open-source Telegram alert and scanner bots
MCP server
Hosted remote MCP server, on Pro
Hosted MCP server at api.struct.to/mcp, two auth methods
Developer / builder analytics
None
Per-builder fee, retention, and concentration analytics, plus builder comparison

What Struct is, and what we could not verify

Struct is a Polymarket data-infrastructure company, describing itself in its own docs as 'the fastest API for Polymarket.' Struct Explorer, its open-source consumer dashboard, is a showcase: its GitHub description calls it a project that 'demonstrates what can be built on top of the Struct SDK,' with trader profiles, PnL charts and calendars, a leaderboard, and a Trader DNA archetype radar.

explorer.struct.to returned an HTTP 429 'Vercel Security Checkpoint' page to every fetch attempted on 2026-09-17, for the home page, robots.txt, sitemap.xml, and the traders route alike. So the Explorer facts in this comparison come from its open-source repository's README (last pushed 2026-08-03), not a live check of the deployed site, and the deployed product may since have changed.

Venue coverage and the API

StructA free API tier and a path to more venues.

Struct's API covers Polymarket live today, with cross-venue market matching in early access across Kalshi, Limitless, Predict.fun, and Hyperliquid. Its free tier gives 5,000 credits a month with no subscription, and an x402 pay-per-call option settles each request in USDC with no minimum.

0xinsider covers Polymarket only, and its API and MCP server require an active Pro subscription; there is no free self-serve tier.

Trader profiles and scoring

0xinsiderA published, floor-gated grade against an undocumented archetype.

Struct Explorer's README describes 'mark-to-market and fee-accurate' PnL, a PnL calendar heatmap, and a Trader DNA archetype built from a seven-axis radar of lifetime trading stats. How that archetype is computed is not published in the README, and no composite grade was found.

0xinsider's grade is about 95% realized (banked) profit, and eligibility floors do real work: anything above a C needs verified net-positive realized profit, and the top three grades also need a real resolved-market count and a survivable worst drawdown. The full risk-metric set (Sharpe, Sortino, drawdown, expectancy, VaR, Kelly fraction) ships on every graded wallet.

Developer tools, alerts, and MCP

StructA wider alert surface and developer tools 0xinsider does not build.

Struct's docs describe 30+ in-app alert types and 30+ webhook event types, plus open-source Telegram bots for alerts and search that anyone can fork. Its dashboard also runs an AI chat agent with an 'Insider Finder' mode, which needs an active API key to use. A hosted MCP server sits at api.struct.to/mcp, and Struct also offers per-builder fee, retention, and concentration analytics, a developer-facing feature with no 0xinsider equivalent.

0xinsider's alerts run by email today on the wallets and markets a reader names, and its own hosted MCP server ships on Pro.

What each one costs

Struct's API pricing is published in a straight credits table: Free ($0, 5,000 credits/mo), Hobby ($49/mo), Startup ($299/mo), Scale ($999/mo), and custom Enterprise pricing, plus two months free on annual billing. What Struct Explorer itself costs an end user, or whether any of its features are paywalled, is not published.

0xinsider's free account includes the full trader leaderboard, full trader profiles with Insights, the previous day's large trades, and one Pick of the Day. Pro adds the live large-trade feed, custom alerts, Insider Radar, the REST API and MCP server, and in-game position changes while a game is live. Current plans are on the pricing page.

Which one to use

Use Struct if the job is building on top of Polymarket data yourself: a free self-serve API tier, webhooks, an MCP server, and a path to other venues once market matching leaves early access.

Use 0xinsider if the job is reading a sports and esports grade someone else built and verified, with published eligibility floors and a full risk-metric set, and no API key required to start.

Pros and cons

Friction points and advantages in plain language.

0xinsider

Published grade with eligibility floors, not an undocumented archetype score
Full risk-metric set (Sharpe, Sortino, drawdown, expectancy, VaR, Kelly) on every graded wallet
Dedicated sports and esports product with live per-game boards
No API key required to read the free tier
No free self-serve API tier; Struct's starts at 5,000 credits a month for $0
Polymarket only; Struct's market matching spans five venues in early access
No builder-code or protocol-level analytics

Struct

Free self-serve API tier, plus x402 pay-per-call pricing
Cross-venue market matching across Polymarket, Kalshi, Limitless, Predict.fun, and Hyperliquid (early access)
Open-source Telegram alert and scanner bots, plus a hosted MCP server
Builder-code fee, retention, and concentration analytics with no 0xinsider equivalent
No published composite trader grade; the Trader DNA archetype method is not documented
Explorer's end-user pricing is not published, and whether any feature is paywalled could not be confirmed
explorer.struct.to returned a bot-verification challenge to every fetch on 2026-09-17, so its live dashboard could not be checked directly
Best for

Pick the platform that matches the job, not the hype.

Choose 0xinsider if you…

  • Traders who want a published, floor-gated grade instead of an undocumented archetype score
  • Sports and esports traders who want a dedicated per-game board and in-play tracking
  • Readers who want the full quant risk-metric set without touching an API

Choose Struct if you…

  • Developers who want a free, self-serve Polymarket API with pay-per-call pricing
  • Anyone who wants price and liquidity matched across five prediction and event-contract venues
  • Teams that need builder-code fee, retention, and concentration analytics
FAQ

0xinsider vs Struct: common questions

What is the difference between 0xinsider and Struct?

Struct is a Polymarket data-infrastructure company, describing itself in its own docs as 'the fastest API for Polymarket.' Struct Explorer, its open-source consumer dashboard, is a showcase: its GitHub description calls it a project that 'demonstrates what can be built on top of the Struct SDK,' with trader profiles, PnL charts and calendars, a leaderboard, and a Trader DNA archetype radar.

How do 0xinsider and Struct compare on venue coverage and the api?

Struct's API covers Polymarket live today, with cross-venue market matching in early access across Kalshi, Limitless, Predict.fun, and Hyperliquid. Its free tier gives 5,000 credits a month with no subscription, and an x402 pay-per-call option settles each request in USDC with no minimum.

How do 0xinsider and Struct compare on trader profiles and scoring?

Struct Explorer's README describes 'mark-to-market and fee-accurate' PnL, a PnL calendar heatmap, and a Trader DNA archetype built from a seven-axis radar of lifetime trading stats. How that archetype is computed is not published in the README, and no composite grade was found.

Continue from here

See the same data inside the trading terminal.

Match these comparisons against live Polymarket trader behavior, large-trade flow, and signals.

Daily picks, sports and esports breakdowns, and live trades as they fill.

Daily picksSports and esports analyticsLive trades