4,798 traders scored on profit, risk-adjusted returns, and consistency.
Each score is a weighted average of 6 metrics covering profit magnitude, risk-adjusted returns, capital efficiency, and consistency, then adjusted via Bayesian shrinkage — scores are pulled toward 50 until enough data proves the trader's edge. Only traders with positive P&L qualify.
Total profit on a log scale. Bigger profits rank higher — a $100K trader scores higher than a $1K trader.
Profit earned per unit of risk. Higher = more consistent profits relative to volatility.
Return on volume traded (PnL / Volume). Rewards traders who extract more profit per dollar deployed.
Total profits / total losses. A score of 2.0 means $2 earned per $1 lost.
Worst peak-to-trough decline. Lower drawdowns score higher — measures risk control.
Percentage of profitable trading days. Penalizes one-hit wonders and lucky streaks.
$ 0xinsider explain-scoring --version 3
# hard filters (must pass all)
total_pnl > 0
markets >= 5
volume >= $1,000
raw_score = weighted_avg(profit_mag, sharpe, roi, pf, drawdown, consistency)
confidence = f(n_markets, pnl)
final_score = bayesian_shrinkage(raw_score, confidence)
# undefined metrics excluded, not defaulted to perfect
# negative PnL traders are not ranked
scoring v3 complete · 4798 traders ranked