Arkham Alternative: A Trader Grade Against Wallet Deanonymization
Arkham deanonymizes Polymarket wallets and ranks them by an Elo-style accuracy rating. 0xinsider grades sports and esports wallets on realized profit with published eligibility floors.
Arkham's pitch is direct: it deanonymizes Polymarket wallets, tags over 800,000 verified entities and 3.5 billion address labels (its own figures), and ranks traders by an Elo-style accuracy rating that explicitly ignores position size. arkm.com returned a bot-verification challenge to every fetch attempted for this review on 2026-09-17, so its facts here come from Arkham's reachable surfaces: its announcements, its API docs, and its sitemaps. 0xinsider covers Polymarket sports and esports only, with a published, floor-gated grade and a full risk-metric set.
Fast signals before you read the full breakdown.
Wallet identity
B leads0xinsider
Address-level only
Arkham
Deanonymizes wallets and traces fund flows across chains
Trader scoring
A leads0xinsider
Published grade with eligibility floors
Arkham
Elo/MMR-style rating; explicitly ignores bet size
Behavior tags
B leads0xinsider
Insider Radar flags
Arkham
20+ published tags, including per-sport tags
Alert channels
B leads0xinsider
Arkham
Email, Telegram, and webhooks
0xinsider vs Arkham feature comparison
What Arkham is, and what we could not verify
Arkham's own framing is blunt: 'Arkham deanonymizes prediction markets. Every trader on Polymarket has a track record - we show it to you.' It sits inside a much larger on-chain intelligence platform that also covers token flows, exchange balances, and other chains.
arkm.com, its predictions page, its home page, and its pricing page all returned an HTTP 403 Cloudflare challenge to every fetch attempted for this review on 2026-09-17. The facts here come from Arkham's other public surfaces: its announcements blog, its API documentation, and its sitemaps.
Wallet identity and fund tracing
→ArkhamReal identity and fund-flow tracing, at a scale 0xinsider does not attempt.Arkham's core differentiator is identity, not just activity. It says it has built 'the largest catalogue of deanonymized on-chain traders on Earth, with over 3.5 billion address labels and 800,000 Verified Arkham entities,' and its Visualizer and Tracer tools map a wallet's transactions across every address it controls, on any chain Arkham covers. Twenty-plus published Polymarket tags include potential-insider, fresh-wallet, resolution-sniper, bot, market-maker, early-mover, and tags for soccer, NFL, NHL, NBA, and MLB traders specifically.
0xinsider tracks a wallet by its Polymarket address. It does not attempt to link that address to a real-world identity, and it publishes no behavior-tag taxonomy comparable to Arkham's.
Trader scoring: an Elo rating against a published grade
→0xinsiderA published floor and a full risk-metric set, against an Elo rating that ignores size.Arkham's Elo-style rating, launched 2026-06-29, ranks 'traders based on prediction accuracy,' rewards a correct call at longer odds more than one at short odds, and by its own description 'does not take bet sizing into account.' The exact formula (its K-factor, its starting rating) is not published. Arkham's own figures for the top-ranked trader (a 64.3% win rate over 2,644 bets, an Elo of 2389) differ from a 66.1% win-rate figure attributed to the same wallet in third-party press coverage, which appears to reflect a different snapshot.
0xinsider's grade is about 95% realized (banked) profit, with eligibility floors that do real work: anything above a C needs verified net-positive realized profit, and the top three grades also need a real resolved-market count and a survivable worst drawdown. Every graded wallet also carries the full risk-metric set: Sharpe, Sortino, drawdown, expectancy, VaR, and Kelly fraction, none of which appear in Arkham's published wallet-summary fields.
Alerts and detection
→ArkhamMore channels, and a published tag taxonomy underneath them.Arkham's alerts fire by email, Telegram, and webhook, customizable by address, entity, position size, and token type, on top of the behavior tags above. Its API also exposes order-book and top-holder endpoints for individual Polymarket markets.
0xinsider's Insider Radar publishes statistical flags with the wallet, market, and timestamp attached, and today's alerts run by email on the wallets and markets a reader names.
What each one costs
Arkham's own web-app pricing could not be checked behind the Cloudflare challenge. Its API is usage-based, described as 'custom-built' and starting at $100/mo in credits, with individual Polymarket endpoints costing 1 to 2 credits each, plus an x402 pay-per-request option at $0.20 per credit.
0xinsider's free account includes the full trader leaderboard, full trader profiles with Insights, the previous day's large trades, and one Pick of the Day. Pro adds the live large-trade feed, custom alerts, Insider Radar, the REST API and MCP server, and in-game position changes while a game is live. Current plans are on the pricing page.
Which one to use
Use Arkham if the job is identity: linking a Polymarket wallet to a real-world entity, tracing its fund flows across chains, or filtering by a published behavior tag.
Use 0xinsider if the job is a sports and esports grade with a published, floor-gated method and a full risk-metric set, reachable without a bot-verification challenge.
Friction points and advantages in plain language.
0xinsider
Arkham
Pick the platform that matches the job, not the hype.
Choose 0xinsider if you…
- Traders who want a published, floor-gated grade with a full risk-metric set
- Sports and esports traders who want per-game boards and in-play tracking
- Readers who want a hosted MCP server without writing their own script
Choose Arkham if you…
- Readers who want a wallet linked to a real-world identity or entity, not just an address
- Anyone who wants to trace a trader's fund flows across multiple chains
- Traders who want alerts by email, Telegram, and webhook on named addresses or entities
0xinsider vs Arkham: common questions
What is the difference between 0xinsider and Arkham?+
Arkham's own framing is blunt: 'Arkham deanonymizes prediction markets. Every trader on Polymarket has a track record - we show it to you.' It sits inside a much larger on-chain intelligence platform that also covers token flows, exchange balances, and other chains.
How do 0xinsider and Arkham compare on wallet identity and fund tracing?+
Arkham's core differentiator is identity, not just activity. It says it has built 'the largest catalogue of deanonymized on-chain traders on Earth, with over 3.5 billion address labels and 800,000 Verified Arkham entities,' and its Visualizer and Tracer tools map a wallet's transactions across every address it controls, on any chain Arkham covers. Twenty-plus published Polymarket tags include potential-insider, fresh-wallet, resolution-sniper, bot, market-maker, early-mover, and tags for soccer, NFL, NHL, NBA, and MLB traders specifically.
How do 0xinsider and Arkham compare on trader scoring: an elo rating against a published grade?+
Arkham's Elo-style rating, launched 2026-06-29, ranks 'traders based on prediction accuracy,' rewards a correct call at longer odds more than one at short odds, and by its own description 'does not take bet sizing into account.' The exact formula (its K-factor, its starting rating) is not published. Arkham's own figures for the top-ranked trader (a 64.3% win rate over 2,644 bets, an Elo of 2389) differ from a 66.1% win-rate figure attributed to the same wallet in third-party press coverage, which appears to reflect a different snapshot.
See the same data inside the trading terminal.
Match these comparisons against live Polymarket trader behavior, large-trade flow, and signals.
Lakers moneyline vs Celtics
Profitable wallets hold Lakers, led by a grade-A trader.
Per-league profitable-wallet share, win rate, and CLV on every board.
Daily picks, sports and esports breakdowns, and live trades as they fill.
